JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 25, 2003

A- de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Empresa Vives Comunicaciones S.A. Vs. Comision Nacional De Television

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Autoridad pública del orden nacional
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se remitió el expediente al Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca Sección 2° Subsección C para que adelante la correspondiente actuación judicial, toda vez que de acuerdo con lo preceptuado el Art. 1° numeral 1° del Decreto 1382 de 2000, las acciones de tutela que se interpongan contra cualquier autoridad pública del orden nacional, serán repartidas para su conocimiento, en primera instancia, a los Tribunales Superiores de Distrito Judicial, Administrativos y Consejos Seccionales de la Judicatura.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (20 points)
  1. REMITIR el expediente al Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca Seccion 2deg Subseccion C para que adelante la correspondiente actuacion judicial.
  2. EDUARDO MONTEALEGRE LYNETT
  3. Presidente
  4. JAIME ARAUJO RENTERIA
  5. Magistrado
  6. ALFREDO BELTRAN SIERRA
  7. Magistrado
  8. MANUEL JOSE CEPEDA ESPINOSA
  9. Magistrado
  10. JAIME CORDOBA TRIVINO
  11. Magistrado
  12. RODRIGO ESCOBAR GIL
  13. Magistrado
  14. MARCO GERARDO MONROY CABRA
  15. Magistrado
  16. ALVARO TAFUR GALVIS
  17. Magistrado
  18. CLARA INES VARGAS HERNANDEZ
  19. Magistrada
  20. MARTHA VICTORIA SACHICA MENDEZ
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Alfredo Beltrán Sierra
Magistrado
✓
Alvaro Tafur Galvis
Magistrado
✓
Clara Ines Vargas Hernandez
Magistrado
✓
Eduardo Montealegre Lynett
Presidente
✓
Jaime Araujo Rentería
Magistrado
Read dissent
✓
Jaime Córdoba Triviño
Magistrado
✓
Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa
Magistrado
✓
Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra
Magistrado
✓
Rodrigo Escobar Gil
Magistrado
Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.